If the US is stock buying futures, what does that mean?

This is to follow up on the previous post that the US government may have been buying futures to artificially increase the stock market. In the following, I give a hypothetical scenario if the government had bought futures, and when the positions expired, what would happen.

Suppose the US government may have put bought index futures at some date a couple of years away. Given a margin requirement of say...10%, 100 billion worth of futures over 6 months would translate into some $1 trillion of buying power.

When people buy these futures, the sellers will have to buy the index to hedge their positions. They would buy 1 trillion dollars worth of stock so they might deliver these to the government some years away.

So, what happens when the government closes out their positions by offsetting at some earlier date. Well, the opposite happens, there will be no buying power and a lot of shorts. In fact, all the institutions which took the other side of the trade don't have to hold their stocks any more and will more likely sell the positions. As we approach the futures date, we will get a lot of selling, to the tune of a trillion dollars of selling power in the stock market.

When closing out futures contract, the government could theoretically take delivery, but that would translate them into putting up even more money for the basket of stocks they take delivery for. This won't happen. I don't know how the treasury could justify a hundreds of additional billions to congress just to purchase stock.

The last option is that they could roll over the futures position to an even further date. The government would close out, the counter parties sells one trillion worth of stocks, and reopen, the counter parties buy another one trillion worth of stocks. Nothing much except a flat and choppy market would ensue in this case.

Either the treasury/fed could perpetuate the positions or close them out.

Possible manipulation on the stock market by US government?

Usually I tend not to write about this kind of speculative thing, but I find this rally fishy and evidence presented by zerohedge, although circumstantial, shows most of the rally since September 2009 has taken place in the after hours. The data might be coincidence, but yes, the US government boosting stock prices through buying futures would be a perversion of government intervention in free markets and this is showing the world that the stock market can be gamed through the futures market.

The world has believed that investing is something that is based on the performance of companies and economies. If they have to account for whether or not the government will buy or sell futures to game the market, then basically they will have wrecked decades of faith and trust by the public in markets. More people will know that the market is really a gamble and investing will have become a thing of the past. Why would people invest in the market if they know that it can be manipulated?

Of course, this after hours manipulation might just be nothing but an anomally but hopefully this thing gets sorted out or people will just lose faith.

Maybank Monitoring Dubai Situation closely

From the Business Times:

Maybank's branches in Bahrain and London are monitoring the situation closely even though its loan exposure there is only a fifth of a per cent of its total.

MALAYSIA'S biggest lender Malayan Banking Bhd (Maybank) (1155) does not expect to be affected by the debt crisis in Dubai as its loan exposure there is only a fifth of a per cent of its total.

"Our branches in Bahrain and London are monitoring the situation closely. We are hopeful and believe the issues in Dubai will be resolved," said chief executive officer Datuk Sri Abdul Wahid Omar in Kuala Lumpur yesterday.

On November 25, Dubai sought a freeze on repayment of US$26 billion (RM89.44 billion) debt linked to Dubai World and its two main property units, Nakheel and Limitless World.

I quoted from an earlier post [1] that Malaysia should be proactive in the Dubai siutation. Finally, Maybank came out and said they are monitoring it closely. Islamic Finance as a whole is under scrutiny. It's a rather profitable niche for Malaysia, and it's ridiculous to take a lackadaisical approach. The government should send some people over there to keep track of the situation and lobby in Malaysia's interest as an Islamic Finance stronghold.

[1] Dubai bonds, what are the implications?

The public officials here should be mindful of the risks and take a proactive approach to the UAE handling of this situation. That means sending people over there to lobby the rulers not to screw up. We have vested interest.

Review of Poker Face of Wall st., Aaron Brown

I just finished reading The Poker Face of Wall St. by Aaron Brown, by a professor of finance and ex trader who graduated from Harvard and University of Chicago in Applied mathematics and Finance. For anyone who is into statistics, poker, game theory, and trading; this is an excellent book.



I've always been fascinated by the game of poker, and not for the drama where people put millions on the line for a single hand. I find the way that people interact with each other given uncertainty is a bit mesmerizing.

In most gambling games, black jack, roulette, craps, etc; people bet against the house, there is no uncertainty and only odds, and over a large number of hands, you will more than likely lose money. Poker is the only game which combines both uncertainty of people and odds to make a wonderfully unpredictable game.

The human involvement in the game brings ways to make money and make it consistently. Why do you think the house never have their dealers play poker? They aren't sure if they can win over a large number of hands. Even if they give themselves an edge, its not certain as there are so many unknowns. They only get a cut of the winning pot. This isn't the best way to make money for casinos.

First, the book talks about how almost every economic activity takes on a gambling twist. The author gives examples and dispels common notions about securities and investments that they are mainly a gamble, and not the safe instruments we are spoon fed by sales people. He even asserts that major stock market crashes were more of an unpredictable event, there were no real big news events before or after that just caused the plunge. This lends credence to the unpredictability in markets. He then talks about how gambling played a pivotal role in providing capital to those who needed it in business such as Bill Gates who used poker money to start up Microsoft.

He talks about trading, poker, bluffing, and game theory and asserts some major pitfalls of practitioners of game theory. He thinks that knowledge of game theory is more useful as a way to win over people who use game theory. I think so too. Game theory works better in one on one games but horribly in Poker games which involve groups of people. People who use game theory will generally lose over time especially when they continue to meet people who are better than them.

He also says that people need to take risks to make real money in the world. When you've got a good hand, you have to have the guts to take risks. I believe he doesn't say that people should take dumb risks. For me, a person who thinks he should run a business when he sees so many successful people running a business is a dumb risk. Most people fail. Don't believe me, believe in the statistics.

On the other hand, if they got nothing to lose, yes it may be a worthwhile risk much like a lottery ticket or a business. For those with money it's a horrible bet. Humans also have this false confidence that say "I will make it work" which is a fallacy. They read all these books which give them confidence that they too can do it, they follow the advice to the letter, and fail. In running a business, a lot of it is luck. Don't believe all the hype out there about the Warren Buffetts or Bill Gates and their stories.

Definitely, this book is food for thought. I also read Nassim Taleb's Fooled by Randomness, which is an excellent complementary read to Poker Face on Wall st. Reading both will give you a greater understanding than if you were to choose just one as both books talk about fairly difficult abstract concepts.

Bursa Malaysia should look into Options

The KLSE needs more financial innovation within a "structured" manner. Options are an excellent way to produce arbitrage opportunities that could make the market more efficient. Fisher Black, nobel prize winner and one of the creators of the Black-Scholes theory for option pricing reasoned that options were another instrument that could aid in price discovery and arbitrage.

For the Malaysian securities market, we need more ways to derive daily prices. Options will create volume in stocks and securities. At the same time, with these extra revenues, Bursa Malaysia and the Government stand to cut some of the taxing stock transaction fees. This will also create a more liquid finance system.

So to summarize:

1. Better price discovery for stocks.
2. Extra revenue will bring in room to cut current commission rates.
3. Higher security volume resulting from lower commissions and hedging activities.
4. More liquidity and efficiency.
5. More foreign investor interest as a result

Astro to launch HDTV services

From the Business Times:

ASTRO All Asia Networks plc will launch high-definition television (HDTV) in Malaysia on Friday, said Astro TV chief executive officer Datuk Rohana Rozhan.

HDTV is a digital television broadcasting system with higher resolution than traditional television systems.

"Astro TV is now available to some 2.875 million residential subscribers who will be able to subscribe to its next generation of services, commencing with HDTV and high level interactivity and connectivity," she said.

"The roll out of these services is estimated to cost some RM200 million, including marketing and operating costs of approximately RM150 million, over the next financial year, ahead of revenue and earnings from these services," she said in a statement today.

Rohana said Astro TV will continue to focus on evolving content and technologies ahead of consumer trends, to lead by innovation in response to demanding and sophisticated customers.

Astro All Asia Networks today announced a higher pre-tax profit of RM195.69 million for the third quarter ended Oct 31, 2009 compared with a pre-tax loss of RM212.37 million in the same quarter last year.

Its revenue grew to RM863.49 million from RM744.54 million due to a strong growth reported by Astro TV.

"Astro TV delivered a strong set of results this quarter on the back of a price increase, the introduction of new packages, net subscriber growth of 94,000 and disciplined cost management," Rohana said.

The direct-to-home TV joint venture business in India, Sun Direct TV, reported strong subscriber growth with some 500,000 new customers activated for the quarter ended Oct 31, bringing the total to 4 million customers, she said.

It also announced an interim tax-exempt dividend of 2.5 sen per share for the third quarter, bringing total dividend to-date to 7.5 sen. - Bernama

From what I heard from my Astro installer, HDTV won't actually be available for some time. This launch seems to be merely a formality. In addition, not all channels will be HD, the electronic HD box will cost more, and HD channels will cost more. We're looking at a year or two away at least.

Disclaimer: This is just what I heard from my Astro installer, who knows, Astro could change its mind at any time or my installer could be lying.

Goldman Sachs in Malaysia

From the Business Times:

MALAYSIA has given U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs licences to set up fund management and advisory operations in the country, as the Southeast Asia nation competes for foreign investments.

The licences were given as part of the liberalisation measures announced by Prime Minister Najib Razak earlier this year, the country’s securities regulator, Securities Commission Malaysia , said in a statement today.

Goldman Sachs’ entry “demonstrates the group’s confidence in the growth opportunities available in the Malaysian capital market,” said the SC.

Other global financial companies such as JPMorgan and Credit Suisse already operate in Malaysia.

“We look forward to playing a larger role in their development,” Leissner said in the SC statement.

Malaysia in June unveiled a raft of measures to boost investment in the slumping economy and lift a laggard stock market, including waiving the condition that local companies should reserve 30 per cent of any post-IPO share sale to Malay investors.

Corporate activity in Malaysia is expected to rise next year and bolster the stock market, analysts say.

Malaysia this year saw Southeast Asia’s biggest ever IPO after the US$3.3 billion offering by Maxis Bhd the country’s biggest mobile provider.

Malaysia is the worst-performing market in Asia so far this year, up just 44 per cent, compared to Indonesia’s more than 80 per cent gain and Thailand’s 56 per cent rise. - Reuters

Wow...looks like Goldman Sachs is coming to Malaysia. I think competitors should be scared. The great vampire squid is coming to town:

The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it's everywhere. The world's most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.

That doesn't paint a pretty picture. Well, after all the bad media, they try to paint themselves in a better light in that they are doing God's work. Oops, just a little too bright. Now they are declaring themselves holy to the world.

When it comes from their CEO, the statement will almost be certainly taken out of context. Seems to me he seriously misjudged how many people still felt betrayed by the government with their tax payer dollars paid out in bonuses to Goldman Sachs.

Anyways, with so much notoriety, they feel like they can be accepted in a country such as Malaysia. Perhaps, maybe they'll be welcomed with open arms as people generally go to those who can get them the most money. Go with Goldman, their reputation to win at any cost, and you can't lose, or can you?

Dubai bonds, what are the implications?

I've heard some interesting stories from my friend about doing business in Dubai. He sells jewelry and regularly makes trips over there. His customers over there buy jewelry in large and lucrative quantities and he has built the contacts and relationships so that it is worth it for him to hand carry his jewelry from Malaysia and sell it in Dubai.

Sometimes, when my friend would call up, they would tell my friend they were busy and then out of the blue tell him to come NOW. They treat him like a dog. That example speaks a lot about the over cocky style of business over there. So it doesn't surprise me when Abu Dhabi tells Dubai to handle their own problems.

But now, the world is placing a huge microscope over the situation and how it is handled. This also has huge implications for Islamic finance. If the bond holders pull the nuclear option and take the assets over in court, we will see how the UAE responds as they probably will not be prone to letting foreigners come up and take over nationally backed companies. Further opaquing the situation, the Islamic Sukuk bonds may not give holders the legal strengths of bonds as they are considered a form of equity and bonds. Although, I'm sure the sukuk holders would prefer bond power in re-organization. I think a lot of people buying the Sukuks believe they are a type of bond.

The law system in in the UAE is also suspect as the courts basically do what the rulers say if they so deem it. For small cases, I think re-organization is not a problem, but for something like Dubai World, international investors will scrutinize their decision.

Even if Malaysia does not have a lot of interests directly affected by Dubai's crisis, their future growth and confidence in Islamic financial instruments are under scrutiny. They are affected as an Islamic finance hub. Future slow down in growth from this area will cut valuations of players in the Islamic finance arena today. A dubious ruling will definitely see the financial arena in Malaysia drop in value to investors. The public officials here should be mindful of the risks and take a proactive approach to the UAE handling of this situation. That means sending people over there to lobby the rulers not to screw up. We have vested interest.

Malaysia property bubble in the making?

This is a conundrum that I've been debating. I've yet to see very many housing articles, data, and research seriously critiquing the housing market here.

When I look information such as household income to price, I see a lot of houses overpriced. Consider the average household income is RM4000. How can they afford houses that run in the RM270 to RM300 per sq. ft range. I see young people going for new properties running at RM400, RM500+ per sq ft price. Not only that, the standard down payment here is 10%. Most people can't put up the 20% equity.

In fact, I've been hearing that consumers can get around that 10% down payment with a measly 3% down payment (7% covered by the contractor)! A lot of the practices such as option arms, almost no down payment, and interest rate resets into the second and third year that doomed the US are prevalent here. People should use the low rate period to pay down the amortization on the house and instead are spending it on consumer goods as evidenced by the growth in consumer loans and consumption.

The government isn't doing much to curb the risk although they mentioned that they are concerned. We have the housing capital gains tax supposedly to cool down the market. But we all know the main purpose of the tax is for revenue. There are far more effective ways on clamping down on the housing market. For one, increase the down payment and ban all these shady teaser rates and zero down payment ideas.

Dubai Debt default, Malaysian companies with exposure to Dubai

From Finance Yahoo(AP):

Sentiment in stocks has been dented by the news that Dubai World, which is thought to have debts totaling around $60 billion, has asked creditors if it can postpone its forthcoming payments until May. That has stoked fears of a potential default and contagion around the global financial system, particularly in emerging markets.

"Certainly the Dubai debt debacle and the uncertainty that it has created has had a severe knock on effect," said David Buik, markets analyst at BGC Partners.

Kit Juckes, chief economist at ECU Group, said the developments in Dubai and in the currency markets are related as the fall in risk appetite has pushed money into government bonds and into safe haven currencies such as the Swiss franc and the yen.

This, he said, is "testing the tolerance of central banks to see their currencies cause further damage to their economies."

Even if Dubai were to get a bailout from the UAE, the Dubai CDS would be paid in full. Malaysia is majorly affected by this debacle. A big part of the Nusajaya development is with Dubai World! Whoever said islamic debt was safe, weren't affected by the crisis must be really smoking something.

In addition to direct effect, Malaysia is the top country for Islamic Finance. The financial industry will surely be affected.

Who's going to buy the US government debt?

One of the biggest questions that deflationists have to answer versus the inflationists is:

who will buy all the debt issued by the government to keep interest rates down?

Inflaionists say that no one will buy this government debt and thus rates will go up and we will have inflation.

Deflationists have had trouble giving a credible sounding answer to this one. But it is important to address as low government rates are a basic tenant of the deflationist camp. I've had difficulty coming up with a reasonable answer to this myself and I'm skeptical of all ideas on deflation as well as inflation. I'm concluding that the debt issued by the government will be financed by savers.

The next question is when will this happen as it hasn't happened yet? Well, we have to consider China and foreign buyers of US debt. From Barrons:

the real question isn't whether the U.S. will pay back what it's borrowed from abroad. In essence, can foreign purchases of Treasuries keep up with the widening deficit? That's the question posed by Greg Blaha and Ryan K. Malo of Bianco Research in a note to clients.

Back in September 2007, foreign purchases of Treasuries equaled 270% of new issuance, they note, as they sucked up the available supply of U.S. government securities in sight. That was before the budget deficit exploded last year owing to the economic collapse and the cost of the federal bailouts. By September 2009, foreign investors were taking down only 16% of Treasury issuance.

Obviously, foreign purchase of debt is way down and will not be enough. Next, we consider the consumers/savers. The main reason why they have not been putting their money in treasuries is that some of them have been compelled to spend on cars and houses. They've been liquidating what little they have saved. Q3 GDP showed consumers saved 3.3% of personal income as opposed to 4.9% of income in Q2. [1] (Personal savings as a percent of income on line 34)

Anyhow, now we look at the other buyer, the Federal reserve.

The 10 year treasury rates have been going higher as the fed slows their treasury purchases. The Fed ended their treasury purchase in August. The fed's balance sheet also reflects this action. An inflationist would say once the Fed stop purchases, the rates will go up and inflation will soar. This has been happening as of late, probably why gold is up and proving inflationists right so far. But this is only somewhat true for a short period while the consumer transitions to saving again. This is an inflation "head fake."

Fed Balance Sheet (notice the treasury purchase portion of assets has flattened)

Coincidentally, gold has gone a lot higher during this void where the fed ended their buying and the thrifty part of the consumer is spending. Make no mistake, though that consumers will soon return to their saving ways. Of course not all savers turned to consumers at the government's incentive. They are probably the ones to thank for keeping the rates as low as they have been. I imagine after all these stimulus measures have taken effect, the consumer will revert back to saving and de-leveraging and buying treasuries. When the consumer/saver returns to increasing their savings rate, the treasuries will once again increase increase in value.

While I'm not too sure when this will happen, I can't imagine it will take too long, maybe a couple of months. When we see people stop buying into stimulus programs, saving more in the BEA personal income and outlays reports, and the prices of treasuries start to firm up is when we will have the treasury asset class strengthen again for quite a while unless of course the government manages to whip out another carrot. Even then the US government has only so many bullets before people start to lose patience.

Steve Keens, an original look into the financial crisis

Recently, Zerohedge wrote and article on an Australian professor, Steve Keen. The professor did correctly predict the financial crisis and is vocal that the US and Australia is still not in the clear.

One of the key points I got from his talk is that the current model of money supply is flawed. We should think of it like reservoirs and dams, with the dam controlling the flow of money to other reservoirs.

His idea is that dumping trillions of dollars in the reservoirs of banks will just make the water level higher and the rate of flow will not increase to the debt holders. The current economic posture of all this easing of monetary policy to the banks with tarp and asset buying with the fed is basically having little effect.

So, in the end, his conclusion is to actually give the money to the debtors, who have increased their flow the the creditors. This is the most simplest method of debt reduction. Basically he is saying, no pain, no gain. At some point when banks and restrict their flow of money, conventional monetary policy of increasing banks reserves do not work.

Intuitively, this probably explains why government programs like the cash for clunkers and home buyer tax credit had a major bang for your buck effect (money went to debtors), while the TARP program (money went to banks) looks like a failure.

There are some spillover effects of the current government monetary easing in that it does put extra income into consumer's pockets but not that much as many homeowners are on fixed loans. Generally, though the effects are not enough.

This idea does confirm the deflationists' point of view in that if the money is not flowing any faster to the debtors, you will still have the debtors de-leveraging. We should give the money to the debtors and wait to see if the economy will start leveraging up again, then we will have more sustainable growth. But again, this kicks the bucket down the road until another debt crisis hits us.

Takeaways from Lee Heng Guie, CIMB head of economics.

Two presenters: Head of economics, Malaysia and Equity Strategist

Key items:

• The RPGT will be enacted on the opening date. As long as the property sold is before end of this year, you will not get taxed.
• They see a higher chance for a slow recovery than a w or v shaped one.
• Foreign investing in Malaysia is basically a small portion for big fund managers. Despite the insignificant FDI, we still tend to trade in line with other asian economies.
• They see the economic recovery slow but equities are in a bull market but take some profits at this time.
• Malaysia will decouple from the US and world economy at sometime in the future.
• Credit Card service fees will likely stick: service tax of RM50 per card.
  

From my view, they are somewhat inconsistent at times. For instance, they are a buyer of equities but conclude that economic recovery will still be slow. They predict a decoupling from the world economy at sometime in the future, but I imagine they don't have a time frame on that.

My view is that we are in bear market rally and will bounce between highs and lows much like Japan did after their bubble burst. The decoupling will take a long time to happen, and will not happen for years, at least not as quickly as they are predicting. In the mean time, there is still money to be made or lost for a medium term investor.

Three WiMAX licensees fined, MCMC is a joke

From the Star Business:

Three of the four WiMAX licensees have been slapped with fines for not rolling out their networks on time, industry sources said.

The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) is said to have issued letters on the fines to the WiMAX operators more than a week ago.

The players fined are YTL e-Solutions (RM1.9mil), AsiaSpace (RM1.7mil) and REDtone International (RM200,000) for failure to meet the 25% population coverage by the end of March.

The quantum correlates to the level of coverage achieved as at the deadline. However, all three players are appealing against their fines.

Tan Sri Francis Yeoh, head of the YTL Group, told StarBiz that YTL e-Solutions would appeal against the decision on the basis that the company would be ahead of the next roll-out target of 40% by mid-2011.

“We believe in having an extensive network up and running as we don’t see the point in having incremental coverage.

“We take this business seriously. We will have 60% coverage (more than the needed 40%) by the next deadline,” he said.

Another industry player, who declined to be named, said his company had faced a myriad of issues in rolling out its network, especially in relation to obtaining approvals and the land needed to put up the base stations.

“It takes a long time for these government approvals. And if the land is privately owned, prices can be prohibitive for us. This makes it almost impossible to roll out.

“If we were helped with these issues, then it would be fair to impose a fine on us. But these problems are beyond our control,” he said.

Last December, then Energy, Water and Communications Minister Datuk Shaziman Abu Mansor said the Government would withdraw licences from players who could not show good reasons why they are not able to roll out according to proposed plans.

More recently, Information, Communications, Culture and Arts Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim said the MCMC should ensure that providers had delivered on what they had promised.

YTL plans to invest up to RM2.5bil over the next five years for its WiMAX roll-out while AsiaSpace is looking at raising RM300mil, having invested close to RM100mil so far. REDtone is looking at raising RM40mil.

It has also been questioned whether the authorities had been lackadaisical in enforcing deadlines and withdrawing the spectrum rights from those who did not use them.

However, as this case indicates, rolling out a telecommunications network can be fraught with difficulties and complications.

It will be just as challenging to manage that spectrum.

I mentioned before that wimax is basically fool's gold. It's an entry into the already crowded wireless arena. The wimax providers are in fact competing with the established telcos in providing wireless internet services. Furthermore, they are handicapped as they don't have the infrastructure built. Betting people would not gamble on wimax competitors taking a substantial market share from the telcos.

The logistics problem of wimax is a pain and an experienced telecom provider would have an easier time implementing than the current batch. The MCMC is another joke of an telecommunications body. How can they have picked so many failing companies? Not only are there infrastructure problems, but the companies have no experience in telecommunications. If I am a government body, I want someone who will have the best chance to build up capacity for the nation. If that means another telco company winning wimax, then so be it.

In light of all the follies of both companies and the MCMC, the only people who will really be affected is the investors who ponied up the capital for this costly wimax infrastructure. Talk about building bridges to nowhere.

2010 budget reflections, property taxes, financial industry goodies

From the WSJ:

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak promised to curb a burgeoning budget deficit while still supporting economic growth with a personal income-tax cut.

Mr. Najib told Parliament in his 2010 budget speech Friday that the government will cut the individual income tax rate by 1 percentage point to 26%. But in addition to the surprise cut, he announced a 5% tax will be imposed from Jan. 1 on property gains. Mr. Najib also delivered an annual report that forecasts the trade-driven economy will contract 3.0% this year -- better than an earlier forecast of a 4.0% to 5.0% decline -- before rebounding next year to growth of between 2.0% and 3.0%, thanks to previous spending measures and low interest rates.

The government is in the final stages of studying a goods and services tax, Mr. Najib said, but offered no timetable.

The government will fund its 51.12 billion ringgit deficit entirely through domestic borrowings and a shortfall of 40.48 billion ringgit in 2010 will be met "primarily from non-inflationary domestic sources."

The report also predicts average consumer price inflation at 1.0% this year, slower than the forecast of 1.5% to 2.0% made by the country's central bank in March. Exports may shrink 19.2% this year, and may rebound to growth of 5.1% in 2010.

The budget also vows to let foreigners own 100% of Malaysian corporate finance and planning companies, up from 70% now, and relax rules on the sharing of commissions between stock brokers and commission-based dealer representatives.

The WSJ got most of the article correct, but failed to mention property gains are as much as 30% for the first year of ownership reducing gradually until 5% in the fourth year. Taxing unfortunately is quite a blunt instrument, but it will curb the rampant property speculation in Malaysia.

With the average household salary of malaysians being some RM4000 per month, I do not see how most could afford properties of RM300 per square feet. It just boggles the mind. A 300k place would cost about RM2000 in payments and that is not a reality for most Malaysians. 50% of household income is just nuts.

They say our housing markets are strong, but yet they come in with teaser rates just like options arms in the US. News flash, the housing industry encourages a lot of questionable loan practices in Malaysia as well! When the teaser rates adjust, will home buyers be able to pay? 2.5% adjusted to 7%...ouch. comes in at about 70% increase in monthly payments!

Ever since Najib won the election in April, I mentioned that given his affinity to the financial industry through personal ties as well as having a background in economics, the sector would benefit during his tenure. While the budget lacks any "big bang" policy movements for the financial industry, liberalizing regulations is always effective.