Why housing defaults matter

The US has a problem in over-leverage. The banks are leveraged on a capital ratio of 1:12.5, in other words, they keep some 8% in reserves. If a bank has 10% reserves, housing defaults that would decrease their reserves by 3% would put the bank in seizure territory. If the company is public, the stocks will go to zero when seized.

Looking at the following graph, we can see how quickly the default rate has jumped 2% in over a year. Say, 2% defaults result in decrease of reserves by .75% on average, then it only takes 6% of homes defaulting to get the 3% decrease in reserves. We have some major problems.

Housing default (source: calculated risk)

Bank problem list is at 767, up from 653 in March. This problem list has NEVER decreased. More banks seem to be eligible every time I see the FDIC's press release. They are slow-walking the bank seizure process.

If by now the banks can't get their housing delinquencies under control, this year, another wave of foreclosures is going to happen due to the second wave of housing interest rate resets. I doubt anyone believes with another wave of resets happening that the default rate will get lower.


As you can see, the loans which will experience payshocks start increasing around now, through June and July, then pretty much into next year and into 2012. Option Arms default rates are just as bad as subprime.

Banks will write these assets off..and when they do, rest assured their reserves will decrease, and stock prices will go down. Either that or we will have another 5 trillion of QE by the Fed.